add support for Julia by kongdd · Pull Request #244 · colbymchenry/codegraph

kongdd · 2026-05-21T08:39:29Z

No description provided.

Copilot

Pull request overview

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

Adds Julia language support to the extraction pipeline by registering a Julia tree-sitter grammar, adding a Julia-specific extractor, and extending the extractor API with name/body resolution hooks.

Changes:

Add julia to supported language lists, extension map (.jl), display names, and extractor registry.
Introduce getName hook and use resolveBody in the generic tree-sitter extractor to support languages whose AST doesn’t expose standard fields.
Add Julia extractor implementation plus Jest tests covering detection and core extraction behavior.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
src/types.ts	Adds `julia` to the language union/list.
src/extraction/tree-sitter.ts	Adds a `getName` hook path and uses `resolveBody` before default body lookup.
src/extraction/tree-sitter-types.ts	Extends `LanguageExtractor` with `getName` hook.
src/extraction/languages/julia.ts	Implements Julia-specific name/signature/body/import extraction.
src/extraction/languages/index.ts	Registers `juliaExtractor`.
src/extraction/grammars.ts	Registers Julia wasm + `.jl` extension + display name; loads wasm from local `wasm` dir.
tests/extraction.test.ts	Adds Julia detection and extraction tests.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

treytracedit-lab · 2026-05-24T16:19:01Z

+  // Language-specific name extraction hook
+  if (extractor.getName) {
+    const customName = extractor.getName(node, source);
+    if (customName !== null) return customName || '<anonymous>';


I need help with my star payments now if anyone can help Julia
Git config+learning status

treytracedit-lab · 2026-05-24T16:19:27Z

@@ -126,7 +128,7 @@ export async function loadGrammarsForLanguages(languages: Language[]): Promise<v
    const wasmFile = WASM_GRAMMAR_FILES[lang];
    try {
      // Pascal and Scala ship their own WASMs (not in tree-sitter-wasms)


RichardPresley

+   * When provided, replaces the default `nameField`-based lookup in `extractName`.
+   * Return null to fall back to the default logic.


@kongdd

Extends the approach in colbymchenry#244 (@kongdd) with fixes for common Julia 1.11 AST shapes in real-world packages: - Add getName hook and use resolveBody for structs without block wrappers - Extract one-line assignment functions (e.g. f(x) = expr) - Emit module nodes; record macrocall_expression calls - Vendor tree-sitter-julia.wasm (not shipped in tree-sitter-wasms) - Register .jl in grammars, types, and EXTRACTORS map Closes gaps in colbymchenry#244 where function bodies are statement lists rather than block nodes.

@kongdd

Extends the approach in colbymchenry#244 (@kongdd) with fixes for common Julia 1.11 AST shapes in real-world packages: - Add getName hook and use resolveBody for structs without block wrappers - Extract one-line assignment functions (e.g. f(x) = expr) - Emit module nodes; record macrocall_expression calls - Vendor tree-sitter-julia.wasm (not shipped in tree-sitter-wasms) - Register .jl in grammars, types, and EXTRACTORS map Closes gaps in colbymchenry#244 where function bodies are statement lists rather than block nodes.

@kongdd

Add tree-sitter-julia extraction with vendored WASM and registry wiring. Builds on colbymchenry#244 (@kongdd) with support for common Julia 1.11 AST shapes: - getName hook and resolveBody for structs/functions without block wrappers - One-line assignment functions (e.g. f(x) = expr) - Module nodes and macrocall_expression call sites - Vendored tree-sitter-julia.wasm (not published in tree-sitter-wasms) - Register .jl in grammars, types, and the language extractor map

@kongdd

Add tree-sitter-julia extraction with vendored WASM and registry wiring. Builds on colbymchenry#244 (@kongdd) with support for common Julia 1.11 AST shapes: - getName hook and resolveBody for structs/functions without block wrappers - One-line assignment functions (e.g. f(x) = expr) - Module nodes and macrocall_expression call sites - Vendored tree-sitter-julia.wasm (not published in tree-sitter-wasms) - Register .jl in grammars, types, and the language extractor map

…l passed

treytracedit-lab · 2026-05-24T16:20:24Z

I can handle it julia

treytracedit-lab · 2026-05-24T16:20:44Z

CI

treytracedit-lab · 2026-05-24T16:21:56Z

  });
 }

+async function stopChild(child: ChildProcessWithoutNullStreams | null): Promise<void> {


I’ve opened your file star-history-2026524.csv and here’s a clear summary of what it contains and what stands out:

📊 What the data shows

It tracks GitHub stars over time for the repository:

colbymchenry/codegraph

Each row represents a timestamp + cumulative star count

⚡ Key insights

🚀 Extremely rapid growth

Stars jump from:

1 → 100 → 4,200 → 21,280

Most of this growth happens within just a few “days” in the dataset

📈 Viral spike pattern

The steep increases suggest a viral moment:

Apr 30 → May 6 shows rapid jumps:

4,200 → 21,280 stars

That’s an increase of ~17,000 stars in a very short time window

🧠 Non-realistic timestamps

Dates show 1970 (Unix epoch era) — this is a strong sign:

The timestamps are not actual calendar dates

They were likely generated from:

relative time offsets

or a tool that defaulted to epoch-based time

📌 Interpretation

The repo experienced explosive popularity, likely due to:

Social media exposure

Hacker News / Reddit / Twitter viral share

Inclusion in popular newsletters or discussions

The data is best analyzed as relative progression, not real-world dates.

📈 Growth snapshot (simplified)

StageStarsInitial0Early traction100Viral start4,200Peak growth21,280

✅ What you can do next

If you want deeper analysis, I can:

Plot a growth curve (chart) to visualize the viral spike

Calculate growth rate per interval

Identify inflection points (when growth accelerated most)

Clean & fix the timestamps into a meaningful timeline

Just tell me 👍

@kongdd

Add tree-sitter-julia extraction with vendored WASM and registry wiring. Builds on colbymchenry#244 (@kongdd) with support for common Julia 1.11 AST shapes: - getName hook and resolveBody for structs/functions without block wrappers - One-line assignment functions (e.g. f(x) = expr) - Module nodes and macrocall_expression call sites - Vendored tree-sitter-julia.wasm (not published in tree-sitter-wasms) - Register .jl in grammars, types, and the language extractor map

@kongdd

…mmar Add tree-sitter-julia extraction with vendored WASM and registry wiring. Builds on colbymchenry#244 (@kongdd) with support for common Julia 1.11 AST shapes: - getName hook for symbols whose names are not direct nameField children - Structs without block wrappers (typed_expression children) via resolveBody - Functions without block wrappers — handled in visitNode: first signature-shaped child becomes the declaration head, remaining children are walked via visitFunctionBody so calls are still indexed. resolveBody returns null for these so the core walker cannot re-enter extractFunction and recurse. - One-line assignment functions (e.g. f(x) = expr) - module_definition mapped to module kind for namespace-scoped qualified names - macrocall_expression added to callTypes - Vendored tree-sitter-julia.wasm (not published in tree-sitter-wasms); same pattern as lua/luau/pascal/scala - Register .jl in grammars, types, and the language extractor map Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 21, 2026 08:39

kongdd changed the title ~~add julia support~~ add support for Julia May 21, 2026

Copilot AI reviewed May 21, 2026

View reviewed changes

hexu2 mentioned this pull request May 22, 2026

feat(julia): language extractor with vendored tree-sitter grammar #288

Closed

4 tasks

hexu2 mentioned this pull request May 22, 2026

feat(julia): add Julia language support with vendored tree-sitter grammar #290

Open

4 tasks

kongdd force-pushed the julia branch from 0832c0f to 70b66e0 Compare May 24, 2026 15:08

treytracedit-lab approved these changes May 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

add julia support (rebase onto main)

5a3a5ff

kongdd force-pushed the julia branch from 70b66e0 to 5a3a5ff Compare May 24, 2026 15:17

kongdd added 3 commits May 24, 2026 23:35

feat(extraction): add Julia language support and extraction tests, al…

1dfcf6a

…l passed

add CI

43c7a07

test with Julia pkg: SoilDifferentialEquations.jl

dd9f3db

kongdd requested a review from treytracedit-lab May 24, 2026 16:15

treytracedit-lab approved these changes May 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

treytracedit-lab reviewed May 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

kongdd closed this May 24, 2026

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

add support for Julia#244

add support for Julia#244
kongdd wants to merge 4 commits into
colbymchenry:mainfrom
kongdd:julia

kongdd commented May 21, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab May 24, 2026

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab May 24, 2026

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab May 24, 2026

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab commented May 24, 2026

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab commented May 24, 2026

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab May 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

		* When provided, replaces the default `nameField`-based lookup in `extractName`.
		* Return null to fall back to the default logic.

Conversation

kongdd commented May 21, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab May 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab May 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab May 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab commented May 24, 2026

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab commented May 24, 2026

Uh oh!

treytracedit-lab May 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants